BETA This site is in beta. Information is still being added and reviewed.
Training hub Kit

Fidelity kit

A simple, layered way to keep delivery consistent: a checklist every session, a small sample of sessions rated more closely, a monthly supervision review, and a booster that targets the skills that fade fastest.

This kit is a research prototype. Use it alongside your organization's supervision and consent policies, not in place of them. Record or sample sessions only with the client's informed consent and per your site's rules.
Why this matters (evidence)

The accepted approach to keeping lay-delivered programs on track is layered: a self-report checklist every session, a sampled share of sessions rated more closely, and trends reviewed in supervision (Breitenstein and colleagues). Community health worker programs for immigrant and Latina populations have used exactly this session-checklist plus sampled-rating design (the ALMA and PARTNER-MH studies).

Boundary and "do-not-do" skills decay faster than anything else (Gobezayehu and colleagues, 2014), and inoculation-style spot-the-error skills fade within about two months without a booster (Maertens and colleagues). That is why the booster below targets those two things specifically.

1 2 3 4 Workshop Observed practice Solo delivery Booster 6-8 wk

The checklist and sampled ratings run at every step. The booster, first at six to eight weeks and then each quarter, is where the skills that fade fastest get refreshed.

1. Per-session activity checklist

The CHW completes this after every client session. It takes a couple of minutes and becomes the base layer of the fidelity record.

2. Audio-rating sampling protocol

A small, random share of sessions is recorded and rated more closely than self-report allows. Keep it simple.

  1. Consent and recording. With the client's informed consent, and only where your site permits, audio-record the session.
  2. Sample size. Rate 10 to 20 percent of each CHW's sessions, chosen at random rather than hand-picked, so the sample reflects typical delivery.
  3. Rate against the checklist. A trainer or peer rates the recording using the observation checklist, with attention to the safety items.
  4. Reliability check. Have two raters score a subset (for example a quarter of the sampled recordings) and compare, so ratings stay consistent between reviewers.
  5. Store safely. Keep recordings secure, use them only for supervision and quality, and delete them per your site's retention policy.

3. Monthly supervision review

Once a month, the supervisor reviews the record with the CHW. Use this template.

4. Booster schedule

Skills fade, and the ones that fade fastest are exactly the safety-critical ones. The booster is short and focused, not a full re-training.

Supervisor self-check
  1. Is a session checklist actually completed for every session, not just the observed ones?
  2. Is the audio sample random rather than hand-picked, so it reflects real delivery?
  3. Did this month's review look specifically for do-not-do drift, not just overall scores?